Castrated eunuchs were obviously unable to procreate, but the eunuchs mentioned in Isaiah 56:3-5 and Matthew 19:12 were not necessarily castrated, although they are recorded as living in chastity or unable to procreate for one reason or another. Later, the punishment for homosexual acts was castration (Iran still does this, homosexuals routinely go through "sex reassignment" there). There are many in the Bible who did not always successfully resist temptation:ii. Eunuch Meaning: Only a Title. whole "eunuchs" could marry and had full Civil Rights)....also, historical references reveal that males in ancient time had intimate relations with eunuchs.
If Potiphar was literally a castrated eunuch, this shows that his wife looked for sexual activity elsewhere.
An interesting question. Potiphar's wife (who is named Zuleikha, at least according Sefer HaYashar) repeatedly makes sexual advances on Joseph, and as we know, Joseph consistently stays true to his morals (not to mention loyalty to Potiphar) and staunchly refuses (even resulting to running away)!I've always wondered why Zuleikha would make more than one attempt after she is clearly rejected, and why she should would be so "desperate.
I know lots of words that Caleb, that is very true. Bisexuality was the norm. Learn more about Stack Overflow the company
The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Eunuchs in the Bible are typically defined as castrated men placed in charge over a king’s harem of wives and concubines. Also, one of the comments mentioned that "eunuch" is not found in any of the English translations, hence mentioning the Arabic translations above that translated the word as such. but BC eunuchs, like Bagoas (Alexander, Darius) were 100% gay uncut males.What was a eunuch doing with a wife? Also, I've heard that Osnat was Jewish. We rightly admire Joseph as an example of a man or woman of God who resisted temptation. But no physical condition of castration or impotence is mentioned, nor is it likely because Potiphar had a wife (Genesis 39). I regret that I do not have access to the article by Johnston, but I understand his gist from Susan’s answer.First of all, the argument that “research has failed to turn up any evidence for the use of eunuchs as officials in Egypt” is likely to convince only those who believe that the story of Joseph is an authentic record of historic events. Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us
In the Bible, the Hebrew word saris (eunuch), refers to a man in some sort of service to a ruler, but castration isn’t always a part of the story.
Pot'iphar (Heb. "But it occurred to me, that possibly Potiphar was a eunuch. In ancient Egypt, court officials were often castrated so that the authoritative powers knew that their "second in commands" were not a threat to their women. Mi Yodeya works best with JavaScript enabled
Potiphar was an eunuch i (KJV: "officer") of the royal court of Egypt. Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more.