6 Answers. As you see, Esperanto very helpfulAlthough all, learning a language can't be wasting time, never!Definitely! It should also be noted that MOST of the world's languages (96%) have LESS than one million speakers, thus making Esperanto one of the most spoken languages in the world (in the sense that it falls within the top 4% of languages on earth in terms of speakers). I'm considering to learn Esperanto because they say that it will make learning another foreign language easier. In the end the group that learned one year Esperanto and 3 years French, spoke a better French than the other group. I'm bilingual (Spanish & English) and learning German. While you’re there, be sure to subscribe to our channel for more language learning videos. In my humble opinion, Esperanto is not worth learning. However, despite its successes in combining various commonly spoken languages, it ignores over 2000 Asian languages, a similar number of African languages, and the various different alphabet systems found all over the world.
Any natural language, no matter how small the number of speakers it has, is more interesting than an artificial language like Esperanto. And so a new, artificial language was developed, which could be learned by everyone, spoken by everyone, and, as the Universala Esperanto-Asocio states, could be a step towards “the solution of the language problem”. Is it worth my time? Most spoken languages have come about in a predominantly organic way, with words being created and falling out of use with advances in culture, technology and behaviour. Hungary, Finland, Japan and China, among others, have shown interest in taking up Esperanto, representing a willing enthusiasm to put this interlanguage to use. However, if international harmony and multiculturalism are to succeed, do we need to speak the same language?In the year 1887, a language emerged which attempted to answer these questions, but has also raised countless concerns amongst professors, politicians and polyglots ever since. Most of the people who advice this are saying it's good for monolingual people as their second language and would like to learn European languages. I have been using and . Our westernised view of the superiority of English leaves us blind to hundreds of cultures, which we would have deeper access to if only we were able to speak their language.This is where Esperanto comes into the picture. Many people in the English-speaking world wouldn’t hesitate in asking for directions in their own familiar tongue: English. Answer Save. This does pose an alluring alternative to learning an entire new language every time you visit a new country – but how effective is it as a means of communication, and should it take the position of the global language of peace?Our westernised view of the superiority of English leaves us blind to hundreds of cultures, which we would have deeper access to if only we were able to speak their languageTo say that English is the most effective way to talk to anyone in the world would be to drastically limit the horizons of the speaker. This is an obvious side-effect of creating a language that mixes Portuguese with Hindi and Russian, but perhaps acts as proof that an ideal interlanguage is entirely impossible. Please don't pay attention to the capitalist driven reasons for not learning it ("can you use it for work? to me it seems like a great idea, but i'm having trouble deciding if it's worth the work to learn it. There are so many other wonderful reasons to learn this great language. It is worth to learn Esperanto. Esperanto does not give you access to the phonetics of non-European languages, either, because they are just too different. Any Esperanto speakers got any opinions?First off, I'm an Esperantist, as well as a professional translator (I know over 8 languages). In regards to the number of speakers, the 2 million figure has been around for over a decade, and with the proliferation of the internet, coupled with the impossibility of accurate measurements, I'd say anywhere from 2-10 million people can speak the language to varying degrees of fluency. It seems that many learners are undertaking the task more as an intellectual exercise, and less as a potentially useful skill to have; people are learning Esperanto in the same way that they might study Latin grammar.The concept of Esperanto represents the culture of the moment: an outward-looking, explorative political and social environment in which travel and verbal exchange are becoming increasingly necessary and popular. im just interested to see what u can come up with. This is especially true with Romance languages (Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Romanian, Catalan, and French). One last thing: we’re thinking of developing an app to help you learn Esperanto. But lots of people in other countries have done well, even though it's totally not related to their native languages.Yes, there are only 1.5 million Esperanto speakers in the world, but it will realy help you to learn other language such as French, Spanish, Itaian and so on...There was even a study that tested how Esperanto help to learn other languages. However, it seems that its success may not have a place in the world’s future, with the number of Chinese and English speakers continuing to rise worldwide. I'm thinking about trying to lear some Esperanto this summer, because it sounds cool and because I heard it makes it easier to learn a new language later on. Unfortunately, the reality of Esperanto still presents a view of multiculturalism that not only forgets the initial purpose behind cultural exchange as an interlanguage, but is also undeniably Eurocentric. Is Esperanto worth learning? Of course, in the West, it seems as though English is spoken by everyone, just because that’s what we are exposed to most frequently. Relevance. Robert . Esperanto has been proven to be extremely useful for the later acquisition of additional foreign languages. i've never personally met an esperanto speaker. The Oxford Student - Oxford's biggest student newspaper, produced by and for members of the University of Oxford, since 1991.